Aug 21 2009Bryan Singer to Re-Document Europe's Greatest Sword

excalibur-1981.jpg

Bryan Singer, the man working a confusing reimagining of Battlestar Galactica that disregards Sci Fi's already-reimagined Battlestar Galactica, has announced his intentions for further remaking:

Warner Bros. and Bryan Singer are unsheathing "Excalibur," redoing the 1981 John Boorman movie about King Arthur and the Knights of the Roundtable.

The project is still in the early stages, with Warners only tying up the remake rights, which it shares with Boorman. Singer's involvement is still in the talking stage and Legendary Pictures may come aboard the project.

The 1981 movie starred Nigel Terry as Arthur and Cherie Lunghi as Guenevere and featured early performances from Liam Neeson, Patrick Stewart and Gabriel Byrne. The movie told the well-known myth, in a gritty and dramatic fashion, of the young man who draws the sword Excalibur from a stone, is mentored by Merlin, establishes Camelot, loses his wife, Guenevere, to his best friend, Lancelot, and engages in the quest for the Holy Grail.

Now, I don't understand legal mumbo jumbo (I understand it so little that when I say "legal mumbo jumbo," I shake my hands around and kind of make a goofy face, to show how little I understand it), but it seems weird that you'd need the rights to remake Excalibur. Isn't the plot straight-up Arthurian legend? I'm pretty sure you could remake Excalibur and just not tell anyone you've remade Excalibur and, unless you used the exact same script, probably no one would call it out. And if someone did, just say, "Actually, no, this is not a rip-off of Excalibur; my film is influenced by the '90s animated series King Arthur and the Knights of Justice, only I took out the part where Arthur and his knights were all high school football players from the future."

Reader Comments

I would rather watch a movie version of King Arthur and the Knights of Justice than a remake of Excalibur. I actually really liked the 1981 version. And the Knights of Justice had some awesome ideas.

But the sword in the stone wasn't Excalibur. Excalibur was a gift from the Queen of America, I mean the Lady of the Lake

I would like to see a movie that follows "The Once and Future King" more closely, instead of all these stylized remakes that pick and choose what they'd like to include about King Arthur lore.

That armor is way too late. Arthur would have been around the year 400-500.

Good point, how can you copywrite the Arthur legend? And who's going to sue you, Merlin? Morgana?

Good comments too, let's have a true depiction of Camelot someday, not just another person's bad-history version of it. And no way can Excalibur itself be redone, it was either so bad it was great, or so good that it was horrible, I can't decide, but it's a great one for home video nights for sure!

No mention of Helen Mirren? hmmm, she was damn hot in it.

Easily among my top 5 favorite films. Now how about releasing Excalibur on Blu-ray already?!?!

NOOOOoooooo, I love that movie!!! Remakes are the Devil!!!

Really Hollywood? you can't right shit? you do Books, Videogames, you rehash old classic stories and you go and take classic films like War of the Worlds and the Day the Earth Stood Still and F*ck em up.... Really!?!
Why do you stop being Hollywood exclusive DICKS and let real people right you a movie! damn my local 24 hour film fest has better 40min movies to watch then your rehashed Bull$hit!

Post a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to the post. Inappropriate or promotional comments may be removed. Email addresses are required to confirm comments but will never be displayed. To create a link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments.