Feb 19 2009Last Chapter of Focker Trilogy Finally in Development
You'd think that after meeting your wife's parents and then introducing them to your parents, most of your family-related comic mishaps would be over. Not the case (if you're Ben Stiller)! If you're Ben Stiller, and your father-in-law is Robert De Niro, you'll never escape from a living hell of pratfalls and nervous family interactions. You might as well kill yourself. But first have kids, because that will make for a great movie where De Niro can accuse you of milking your children:
It looks like "Little Fockers" is finally coming of age.The long-gestating third installment of the comedy franchise is maturing quickly at Universal — but with new parents.
John Hamburg has been brought on to write the screenplay after Larry Stuckey penned an earlier draft.
Meanwhile, Jay Roach, who of course directed the first two films and had been loosely attached to direct this one, will not helm the picture. The hyphenate is concentrating on the comic romp “Dinner for Schmucks” for DreamWorks and Parkes/Bowles and only will produce “Fockers.”
Among the candidates said to be in the running are comedy veteran Paul Weitz, who wrote and directed “In Good Company” and co-wrote and co-directed “About a Boy”; the quirky-comedy figure David Wain, writer-director of cult pic “Wet Hot American Summer” and Universal’s male-buddy hit “Role Models”; and Peyton Reed, who directed the current Jim Carrey starrer “Yes Man.”
On the casting side, Stiller, Robert De Niro and Owen Wilson — the last of whom had unrelated small parts in the first two pics as an ex-fiance and a minister, respectively, but could have an expanded role here — are in negotiations to star in “Fockers.”
I could always tell we'd need a trilogy to tell the entire Focker arc. Such a rich narrative. At the end of Meet the Fockers, you just get the sense that Ben Stiller needs one more film where he'll finally fully rise above all the family strife, then slip and fall into a pile of dirty diapers. Classic three-act structure.

Reader Comments
1. Erik - February 19, 2009 1:05 PM
The second one was so awful that I think I'd rather lick the anus of a dog with worms than go see the third in this series.
2. Ericalove33 - February 19, 2009 1:19 PM
Just heard that he is ho-oking up with a nice gi-rl on the inter-esting cl-ub called: ____T all min gle Co M____, really ? Sounds it is a famoaus on-line service.
3. sully - February 19, 2009 6:58 PM
pret-ty sure that Owen Wilson played the same character in the first two films... whoever wrote that article is a fuck wad.
Also, I pick David Wain, though I doubt he would do this movie
4. Franklin - February 19, 2009 7:21 PM
On to the important things: Teri Polo's Playboy layout-
http://www.celebsdb.com/Teri_Polo/
5. chuck - February 19, 2009 11:25 PM
I think that is one of the worst-written articles I have ever read.
6. Jannah - February 20, 2009 12:11 PM
What the cheez, the people in that poster look as if their heads were chopped off and then sewn back on! :-p
7. Chantelle - February 22, 2009 12:18 AM
Why do all those guys look really strange and wooden in that pic?
Are these cardboard cut outs from the cinemas?