Dec 22 2008'Fast & Furious' Poster is Reasonably Fast & Furious, I Guess
The way I see it, there are three ways to interpret this poster:
1. The cast of Fast & Furious are standing in the desert, in front of a car, and are being reflected in its hood.
2. Someone got overly excited after the original Fast and the Furious and ran to their local airbrush artist to regrettably de-value their car.
3. An anthropomorphic car is reminiscing about its times on the set of The Fast and the Furious, which is shown through a cartoon shorthand similar to when dollar signs appear in someone's eyes.
It's probably meant to be the first one, but I think the third would be good as a scene in Cars 2.
Check Out The New Teaser Poster From ‘Fast & Furious’! [MTV]
Reader Comments
1. GARTHvader - December 22, 2008 4:02 PM
FIRST and foremost, that engine looks like the engine I have for my GTO.
That's pimpin.
*ignore my lies, I really don't have muscle car. Or a car for that matter.
Only if you consider a FIAT UNO a car, then so be it.
2. lala0428 - December 22, 2008 5:42 PM
Poster looks better than the movie will be.
3. SlowMonkey - December 22, 2008 7:09 PM
Ben Stiller looks silly with his hair flattened.
4. Mark - December 22, 2008 9:20 PM
It's a nice poster, much better thatn most, and quite a clever little tagline.
5. Elle Driver - December 23, 2008 12:05 AM
The desert and the vintage car reminds me of "Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!"
(I still ain't gonna see this, though.)
6. Mark - December 23, 2008 5:01 AM
Oh, it goes without saying the film will be total shit like the rest of them.
7. che-che - December 23, 2008 10:59 AM
when are they gonna make a live action movie of TURBO TEEN!
http://www.retrojunk.com/details_tvshows/204-turbo-teen/
would be suhweet!
8. Wesley - December 24, 2008 8:44 AM
From the angle of that reflection, relative to the angle the photo was taken at, I'd assume that those four somehow became some form of useless X-men, whose only mutant power mysteriously allows them to float above cars in the desert. Or perhaps we're viewing the ghosts of a dead movie franchise floating ominously above another flop, haunting the writers to continue writing sequels until they finally get something right (Only THAT would explain how there could be 4 of these horrid films).
9. Bobby James McGruder - December 29, 2008 10:52 AM
I think the 1st movie takes more flack than it should. I think it was suprisingly good, especially compared to how I thought it would be. The second and third, however. . .