Jan 28 2008New 'The Dark Knight' Photos Spark Obvious Comparisons
I'm probably really late to this observation, but this new shot from The Dark Knight is the first where I realized that the latest Batman mask is getting dangerously close to Bibleman territory. He's just a Willie Aames and a prayer away from a lawsuit.
If you've already noted this, I apologize for taking so long to come around.
Another new shot under the cut.
New Dark Knight Photos [ComingSoon]

Reader Comments
1. TetraShiva - January 28, 2008 4:22 PM
I think it's fair to observe similarities to the Joel Schumacher Batsuit, as well. I have nothing but faith for this movie, but that suit is looking silly.
2. Conor S - January 28, 2008 4:54 PM
I agree with TetraShiva, the cod piece is looking DANGEROUSLY Schumacher! I'm still going to geek out until, during, and after this movie though.
3. Rick - January 28, 2008 5:07 PM
I said it before and i'll say it again, I HATE the fragile/skinny neck they gave him. Makes Batman look increadibly weaker in this film.
4. uni'tard - January 28, 2008 5:50 PM
...or the neck looks incredibly more functional? who knows. kids these days.
5. alberto - January 28, 2008 6:01 PM
Bibleman ?
who's care about him.
6. Mustard - January 28, 2008 6:04 PM
It's not Christian Bale's fault that his package is so out of control that even a new bat suit can hardly contain it.
7. DanB - January 28, 2008 6:40 PM
I'm pretty underwhelmed/disappointed with the whole new resurrection franchise.
Not only is the Bat-themed designing VERY mediocre, the writing barely went farther than telling you exactly what sort of themes it wanted to try and weave into the new redone story.
Back to the designs-- It would help first if they actually did some research. "Nomex survival suit" is what it's called in the first film, which is only used for fire retardant outfits, NOT ballistic protection. It's very weak.
"Gas Powered Grapple gun" is a phrase directly taken from Watchmen. And a magnetic cleat for the hook is just retarded.
Tumbler made to " jump rivers to string bridges across". I guess the little foldout wings are meant to generate lift? RETARDED. Plenty of more practical ways of getting a bridge up.
--Wouldn't the contractors who built the tumbler say "Why the fuck is the Tumbler driving around on the highway with police chasing it? I'm calling Wayne Enterprises."
Regardless, everything seems very poorly thought out and half assed.
I'm gonna go watch the 1989 Batman again.
8. Chuck Milles - January 28, 2008 7:07 PM
How's your mom's basement dude? It's a SUPERHERO movie. Relax....
9. Django - January 28, 2008 7:24 PM
DanB, you're a tool. Unless I imagine Comic Book Guy saying what you typed, then you're an animated tool. Nobody cares.
10. proteon - January 28, 2008 7:39 PM
Danb your whole generation is underwhelmed dude there Chad. Your a "millenial". Look it up Tyler.
11. feckless - January 28, 2008 7:48 PM
I like the nice sturdy built-in bra. Nothing hurts worse than getting hit in the tits.
12. mer - January 28, 2008 8:22 PM
Remember how Michael Keaton couldn't actually turn his head because of the suit? To look left and right, he had to turn his entire body in an awkward robotic manner. It was awesome.
Tim Burton's Batman was great.
Nolan's Batman is great too.
Let's all just dance and have fun.
13. Connor - January 28, 2008 8:56 PM
Speaking of Bibleman, ever notice how Christian Bale's first name is Christian? Freaky.
14. Oscar - January 28, 2008 9:21 PM
Why so serious, Christian Bale?
15. rob - January 28, 2008 9:41 PM
if i had designed the suit i would have made it look like it constructed out of melted down, steel belted tires...traces of tread reflecting off the surface
16. Rick - January 28, 2008 9:54 PM
^ Wesley Snipes in Demolition Man over here
17. anonymouse - January 28, 2008 10:13 PM
i'm just wondering why his belt is slung super low. i mean... it's right above his crotch. shouldn't it be on his waist?
18. Gleek - January 28, 2008 11:13 PM
Yes, but does he have Bibleman's "Breastplate of Righteousness?!" Look it up. Spoiler alert ... Bibleman introduced in Dark Night as Batman's new sidekick.
19. Og - January 28, 2008 11:55 PM
I like the new suit. It's not like Schmuckmakers at all. This poster is tho. I hate this poster. It's uninspired. I could make a better poster with crayons. Somebody got paid for this? Graphic artists everywhere are weeping inside. I think that guy from Kevin Smiths spider story must have made this poster. Or Steve Jobs.
Keaton is to batman as the guys from Perfect Strangers are to cyclops and wolverine. I mean, honestly, Mr. Mom is batman? Sheesh. Keaton. Kilmer. Clooney. It's about time they got away from the last names with a sharp "k" sound. Bale is perfect, not to mention he makes a good batman. What? I don't have a man crush on Bale. Sheesh.
20. armageddonman - January 29, 2008 5:03 AM
I'm sick an tired of the black/green colour scheme. That Matrix-look is SO 90s.
21. dan darko - January 29, 2008 5:12 AM
I agree, this poster is very blah, however i do disagree with the keaton comment, I thought he was rad! The only issue I have with Bale at all in these movies is his obvious mouth, is it just me or does it seem he talks with a slight lisp, anyone close to Bruce Wayne would recognize this. Meh I guess if Clark Kent can get away with just losing his glasses lol... Either way this movie is going to be sweet!
22. Anti "comic book geeks who try to rationalise films but not comic books" - January 29, 2008 7:25 AM
@DanB
perhaps the contractors who built the tumbler weren't watching TV at that time, HAVE U EVER THOUGHT OF THAT???
And if you're talking about inaccuracies, how about Jack Nickolson's Joker walking with a 3 foot long gun down his pants??? and how can a laugh bag survive that fall and still function??? ah?? ah??? answer that and stay fashionable...
23. drbendy - January 29, 2008 7:40 AM
Everything they released for this film was going so well, (Well except the shots with the white blackground) Do you think this was a rushed poster? meaning, that the original had the joker in it and they commisioned a poster without much thought into what it was going to look like. This looks a tad embarrasing.
24. mattk - January 29, 2008 9:54 AM
This is the first helmet that can swivel from side to side. It's a motorcycle-type helmet, which is cool.. Unfortunately, it turned our looking like this...
25. Willravel - January 29, 2008 12:42 PM
We're really in trouble if the Batmobile display reads "FEED ME A STRAY CAT". "Jane, fetch my cape and cowl".
"Tell me, Joker, do you like Huey Lewis and the news?"
26. Luke - January 29, 2008 3:00 PM
Looks like a fucking turtle shell.
Don't like it. The previous was a lot better.
27. Fuck you guys - January 29, 2008 6:19 PM
The Joker didn't fall on the laugh bag in the first movie.
Wasn't Nolan going for a realistic and darker feel for this one??
Can anyone explain why there's a fucking spotlight on batman in every shot?
And why he talks like Henry Rollins?
And why the poster's terrible?
At least the 1989 one was severe and seriously Gothamish, with a crime ridden feel, despite the occasional goofiness.
I can't take this one seriously at all.
COME ON MEMENTO 2!!!
DICK
28. Vinkoniggma - January 29, 2008 7:48 PM
Is his Bat-Penis hidden inside his Bat-Belt-Buckle?
If you don't like the suit, don't worry. I'm sure he'll be in the "Dark" for most of the movie! If there's 1 thing i don't like, it's the Bat-Symbol on his chest.
I feel homoish now. Mmmm