Jan 29 2008First Look at Pixar's Next Gift From God, 'Up'
To fully understand why it is so miraculous each time we behold a new glimpse of Pixar's film wizardry, you have to understand what goes into making a Pixar film. They make a big show of all the fun pools and air hockey tables and holograms and stuff that make up their massive compound, but that leaves out all the hard work done behind the scenes.
When you were in grade school, did you ever have to dissect owl droppings, hunting for bits of undigested rodent bones in the hopes of assembling a full specimen? That's what making a Pixar film is like, except instead of owl droppings, it's God's own shit, which the many skilled artists painstakingly shovel through in the hopes of finding enough lovable characters and heartwarming plot elements to construct a feature film. Above is a full element they excavated--a complete field mouse skull, if you will--and here is what they hope will eventually come of it:
Director Pete Docter described Up as a "coming-of-old-age story" about a seventy-something guy who lives in a house that "looks like your grandparents’ house smelled." He befriends a clueless young Wilderness Ranger and gets into lots of altercations. Says Pixar: "Our hero travels the globe, fights beasts and villains and eats dinner at 3:30 in the afternoon."
The first thing you'll probably notice is that this Pixar film is a departure from their norm, wandering into the realm of 2D animation. It asks the question, what has God been eating differently, and will it affect Toy Story 3? Only time will tell. Never mind; it's just concept art.
New Image From Disney-Pixar's 'Up' [Pixar Planet]

Reader Comments
1. dentonmd - January 29, 2008 5:39 PM
I'm pumped to see pixar throw it back to the days when animation was a bit warmer.
2. TWOO DEE - January 29, 2008 5:54 PM
I'm tearing up already...
3. Angus - January 29, 2008 6:35 PM
Concept Art?
4. canarie noir - January 29, 2008 8:46 PM
Totally agree. I don't think Pixar is moving to 2D animation. That's definitely a concept art.
5. Freck - January 30, 2008 1:02 AM
It was not owl droppings. It was owl vomit. Like furballs. Way cooler than Pixar. Except cars. I love that movie man. Larry the Cable Guy as a car with a Cable on it! It's Genius!
6. ted - January 30, 2008 11:30 AM
thats definitely concept art, there is no way pixar would take on a project without getting to do what they are so good at... Which is their 3d animation...this is just an image from the drawing boards...
7. Og - January 30, 2008 11:46 AM
Pixar did a 2d short for the Ratatouille DVD release. Lasseter now has Disney's entire 2d animation studio at his fingertips. It might be conceptual, it might not.
I do know that if it is going to be released in 2009 and all they are showing is conceptual art they are either keeping a big secret or they have a hell of a lot of work to do.
8. Meg - January 30, 2008 2:45 PM
That's concept art, not 2D animation. Check out the high-res image:
http://pixarplanet.com/blog/images/60.jpg
9. Poops - January 30, 2008 4:00 PM
It's in 3D. Pixar don't have any 2D animators, and they wouldn't be able to keep a secret with an 09 release. That's just concept art, it's 3D for sure.
10. tiredofblogs - January 31, 2008 1:57 PM
Will Pixar ever make a movie that has a female lead? Their movies are great for me, but my daughter wants to watch the older stuff over and over...and over...and over again, because it has actual female characters.