Apr 26 2007Spiderman Doesn't Need You, Sam Raimi or Anyone Else
SKEET SKEET SKEET all over your face, bitch.
Sam Raimi isn't sounding like he wants to do anymore Spidermen, but the studio plans to keep milking this cash cow until the cream you're putting in your coffee isn't cream anymore, but some sort of pus-like goo, or foul smelling dust, or... until it's whatever comes out a dead heifer's teat, really. Guess we'll have to wait till your mom dies for the answer to that one, eh? ZING!
Wait, what's that? Your mom's already dead? Cancer, you say? Ooh, my bad. I'm, uh, I'm sure she was a very special lady.
If Raimi, Maguire and Dunst decided against it, "then I'll be making `Spider-Man' movies," Pascal said, with other actors and filmmakers. "We will continue to make them at the studio."
Since 2002's blockbuster "Spider-Man," Raimi said he had known precisely what he wanted to do with each succeeding chapter. With "Spider-Man 3" wrapping up key conflicts from the first two films, Raimi said he has no story in mind to continue the saga of young Peter Parker and his superhero alter ego.
Reader Comments
1. Sheesh - April 26, 2007 7:51 PM
Overkill on the unfunny.
2. Tucker - April 27, 2007 12:41 AM
Raimi's known what he wanted to do in each succeeding chapter?! In the DVD commentary for the first movie, Raimi is asked who he thinks the next villain will be, and actually says it wouldn't be Doc Ock. I don't know if he was trying to throw people off, like he did with the Venom thing before Spiderman 3, but I have my doubts, oh yes I do.
3. Grammar Police - April 27, 2007 4:34 AM
"Wait, what's that? You're mom's already dead? Cancer, you say? Ooh, my bad. I'm, uh, I'm sure she was a very special lady."
YOUR, not YOU'RE.
4. MargeAggedon - April 27, 2007 11:25 AM
LOL Grammar police.
5. Leathan - April 27, 2007 4:29 PM
I love how in this picture Spiderman is somehow higher than the empire state building in the background. What is he swinging from? The moon?